A Qualitative Analysis of the Natural Resource’s Crisis and Microfinance on Geopolitical Stability and Wellbeing.
Keywords:
Comparative analysis, Microfinance, Natural resource crisis, Well-beingAbstract
This paper aims to conduct qualitative research evaluating the natural resource crisis, especially land conflicts, while examining their broader impact on geopolitical stability and well-being in South-Asian countries. The research investigation seeks to analyze the effect of land competition and resource depletion on geopolitical volatility, which creates domestic as well as international tensions. These disputes trigger multiple consequences that include forced relocation of people along with limited access to income sources, which creates both political instability and adverse impacts on population welfare. The research further examines how microfinance serves as an instrument for boosting domestic resilience while promoting both start-up initiatives and integrated development in resource-stressed areas. Through policy evaluation, case studies and theoretical frameworks (resource dependency theory and sustainable livelihoods framework), the paper highlights structural approaches which alleviate the adverse effects of resource conflicts. The study demonstrates that resources must be governed while grassroots financial tools become integrated to enhance community well-being. It adds valuable insights into the social and political factors operating in South Asia while establishing that sustainable resource use needs to blend with microfinance structures to foster long-term regional stability and improvement in human welfare.